Posts Tagged ‘Naked’
Britney: Live from London
June 14th, 2009 / Author: matt
Britney’s (Sorta) Bare Breasts Hit the Internet
June 8th, 2009 / Author: OK! Staff
Just when you thought it was all sunshine and roses for Britney Spears, who only a year ago was still embroiled in nasty legal and medical battles with everyone from her ex-husband to her father to her supposed best friends, along comes yet another scandal, as nearly two-year-old topless photos of the singer hit the internet.
The pics first appeared on the web site of a British tabloid over the weekend. According to the accompanying story (yes, we didn’t just look at the pics!), the photos of the bare-breasted Brit were taken during the 2007 video shoot for her single "Gimme More."
Nude pics of the pop superstar had long been considered a huge "get" for tabloids around the world, with rumors of revealing pics or sex tapes popping up seemingly every few months. But these appear to be the real deal, though some folks might feel let down as the singer’s boobs are actually covered by what appear to be painted-on tattoos over her nipples.
Whether this latest blip on the Britney radar will have any negative impact on her resurgent career is still to be seen. She just began the European leg of her Circus tour last week and will continue on through the summer.
Vanessa Hudgens Leaving HSM Behind
May 12th, 2009
Vanessa Hudgens appears to be growing up effortlessly, moving from questions about her High School Musical to maturely discussing her future in more adult cinematic roles.
"I will show nudity in a film when the time is right," the 20-year-old starlet revealed to E! at last weekend’s Diesel Only the Brave cologne launch party in West Hollywood.
But don’t expect her to be shucking her squeaky clean image anytime soon, as she says she’s waiting until she’s ready for that career move.
"Right now, I wouldn’t feel comfortable doing it, but like I said, when the time’s right, if it’s an amazing movie that I’m really passionate about and that’s what it calls for, then we’ll see," she added.
Vanessa’s boyfriend Zac Efron recently revealed his serious – and sexy – side in a super hot photo shoot in Interview with a nude model.
These kids grow up so fast!
Lily Allen Declares Bare Intent
February 18th, 2009
In case anyone was wondering, Lily Allen will tell you what she thinks – first it was her thoughts on drugs and alcohol, and now she’s saying she wouldn’t mind taking it all off for cameras!
“I’m just very comfortable in my body," she admits to Extra in an interview airing tonight. "I wouldn’t do it in a ‘Hey-Look-At-My-Boobs kind of way. ‘ ”(Is there any other way?)
Although her new album is called The Fear, the slimmed-down singer doesn’t admit to being afraid of too much these days, after having lived in the media’s spotlight for a few years now.
“I Google myself about ten times a day and that’s the truth," she says of keeping up with the latest gossip. "They bother me if they’re inaccurate in which case I sue… In which case it doesn’t bother me because I make money out of it!”
So if she’s not afraid of fame or getting naked, what is she scared by?
“Probably dying alone… and pigeons maybe," she reveals. "I just don’t like when you walk near them and they fly towards you and they flap their wings fast.”
Daniel Radcliffe’s Naked Truth
December 1st, 2008
Daniel Radcliffe, who first brought Harry Potter to life on the big screen, is doing his best to leave audiences’ image of the boy wizard behind. Radcliffe currently stars in the play Equus on Broadway as a boy with a religious/sexual fascination with horses.
The role, which Daniel first played on the London stage, requires him to get naked during a long and crucial scene–something the 19-year-old naturally admits was not easy to get used to.
"It’s never going to be the most comfortable thing to be naked in front of people on stage," Radcliffe told James Lipton on Bravo’s Inside the Actor’s Studio. "Personally, not my thing. For some people it’s great! But not for me."
To help ease his apprehension, Radcliffe says he trained for 18 months, worked with a vocal coach and made sure his body was in tip-top shape.
"I got kind of fit because I knew I’d be appearing naked," he says, explaining, "The play was there to do. Someone had to do it. If you take the job, you take everything that comes with it."
And does that "everything" include embarrassing arousals on stage?
"A friend asked me once, ‘Are you worried about getting an erection on stage?’" Radcliffe recalls. "I said, ‘no, that would be great!’ Rather the opposite takes place actually."
Julianne Moore: Naked Is Nothing!
May 29th, 2008
A lot of people would think of getting naked in front of millions of movie-goers as kind of a big deal. But not Julianne Moore. She just can’t see what all the fuss is about.
In fact, the Boogie Nights star told Parade.com that a gun shot in a movie should be a lot more shocking to viewers than a nude shot.
Julianne, 47, has stripped for several roles, including Body of Evidence and the Big Lebowski. And the End of the Affair and Boogie Nights and Short Cuts, as well as her 2007 film Savage Grace.
But she says that people’s obsession with nudity means that her more clothed work is overlooked.
"I think it is unfortunate that we have this incredible fascination with actors being naked, when in fact, it’s really not very important," she told the Web site, "and for the most part it does have something to do with the film.
"When you see a gun going off in a movie it’s a pretty shocking and horrific thing, and nobody ever talks about that," she huffed.
"I’ve done a lot of films and I’ve only taken my clothes off in few, but people can’t stop talking about it."
Julianne, whose latest movie, Blindness, premiered in Cannes last week, also said that filming a screen kiss is more frightening than a sex scene.
"The scariest thing to do for me, frankly, is to kiss an actor because that’s very intimate," she said.
"Whenever you kiss anybody in real life for the first time, it’s terrifying. If you have to kiss an actor that you are working with it’s equally terrifying."
Vanessa’s Birthday Gift For Zac: You’re Dumped!
October 18th, 2007
After a tumultuous couple of months for Vanessa Hudgens and Zac Efron, which saw them going through a brief breakup after nude pics of ‘Nessa hit the net, OK! can report that it’s finally over for the High School Musical sweethearts. But this time, it’s Vanessa that’s kicked Zac to the curb — and right before his birthday!
A source close to the dreamy-eyed hunk reveals exclusively to OK! that the deed went down late Wednesday evening, only hours before he was to turn 20. Now, just out of his teens, he’s going around telling friends it’s “officially over.”
One friend tells OK! that Zac is worried Vanessa might have already found a new piece of man candy — though there are no real signs of this being true.
Vanessa’s rep is denying the news. However, no word yet from Zac’s camp on the split, which is interesting when you consider the fact that both stars are represented by the same firm.
Why Doesn’t Disney Have Vanessa’s Back?
October 18th, 2007
After OK! exclusively broke the story Wednesday morning that Vanessa Hudgens had been given the boot from the upcoming High School Musical 3 by Disney, the teen star’s personal publicist (not a Disney employee) seemed to magically appear on every entertainment news site in the world to deny the report.
Of course, that’s what publicists are hired to do and OK! stands by our reporting.
What OK! really wants to know is why — if the story is as false as Vanessa’s rep wishes it were — hasn’t Disney come out in such vigorous defense of the young star of their hugely profitable production?
When originally asked for a comment on the story, OK! was only told the cast, including Vanessa, was “still in negotiations for the feature film,” which they have since repeated to several other news sources, from Fox News to Access Hollywood, apparently refusing to say anything stronger in their defense.
So why wouldn’t Disney just come out with a “We’re standing behind her all the way” comment? “They’re probably waiting to gauge the public’s reaction to the story,” one Hollywood insider explains to OK!. “If HSM fans seem to be okay with moving forward without Vanessa, Disney made the right decision. On the other hand, if there’s some public outcry demanding her return, that’s when you’ll probably see a public statement.”
Well, just judging by the readers of OKmagazine.com, it seems like Disney ought to be extending the olive branch to Vanessa. The overwhelming number of comments on the story were pro-Vanessa, and thousands of supporters flooded the poll, saying they would never watch a High School Musical with her. So, for the sake of the massively popular franchise, Disney had better prick up their ears and listen.
Curtains for Vanessa’s High School Musical
October 17th, 2007
Over a month after frisky nude photos of High School Musical starlet Vanessa Hudgens hit the Internet, OK! can exclusively report that Disney has made up its mind about what to do next and that the 18-year-old actress will not be asked to board the boat for the third HSM film.
“Disney finally decided that they don’t want her back,” an insider reveals to OK!. “They feel that as long as Zac Efron is in the movie, all will be fine. He’s the real star — the household name — and, most importantly, he comes without baggage.”
The source also reports that one of the Cheetah Girls — Adrienne Baillon, 23, or possibly 23-year-old Sabrina Bryan — will take Vanessa’s place. “The producers think that after Dancing With the Stars, Sabrina will be more famous than Vanessa.”
Adding fuel to the fire, Adrienne played coy with OK! when confronted with the information. “I love working with Disney,” she said. “I’m trying to convince Disney to let the whole Disney circle of stars in. I’m just trying to convince Disney to let your Zac and Codys and your Brenda Strongs join High School Musical. We all come in and invade their high school; that would be pretty hot. Put us all together in a feature film!”
Interesting thought — but does “us all” include Vanessa?
